Back to Search Start Over

Prehospital Oxygen Administration for Chest Pain Patients Decreases Significantly following Implementation of the 2010 AHA Guidelines.

Authors :
Carhart, Elliot
Salzman, Joshua G.
Source :
Prehospital Emergency Care; Oct2014, Vol. 18 Issue 4, p471-475, 5p
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to examine trends in oxygen administration following the 2010 American Heart Association guidelines recommendation to withhold oxygen therapy for patients with uncomplicated presentations of ACS whose SpO<subscript>2</subscript> is 94% or higher. Methods. Following IRB review and approval, we performed a retrospective analysis of data obtained from Fisdap<superscript>TM</superscript>, a national, clinical skills tracking system for paramedic students between June 2010 and December 2012. Inclusion criteria included: 1) student consent for research, 2) cardiac chest pain recorded as the chief complaint, and 3) SpO<subscript>2</subscript> data available for review. O<subscript>2</subscript> administration, route, and dose were abstracted, and the percent of patient encounters with oxygen administration was calculated for each year. Unadjusted logistic regression was used to determine if O<subscript>2</subscript> administration rates changed significantly over the study period. Unadjusted logistic regression was also used to determine if there was a difference in the odds of receiving oxygen based on a patient's SpO<subscript>2</subscript> value. Results. 10,552 patient encounters by 2,447 paramedic students from 195 paramedic programs representing 49 states were included for analysis. Prior to release of the new guidelines (2010), 71.9% (95% CI 69.8-74.0%) of patients with SpO<subscript>2</subscript> ≥ 94% received supplemental O<subscript>2</subscript>. Rates of O<subscript>2</subscript> administration were significantly lower in 2011 (64%; 95% CI 62.7-65.3%) and in 2012 (53.1%; 95% CI 51.5-54.7). The odds of a hemodynamically stable chest pain patient with SpO<subscript>2</subscript> ≥ 94% receiving supplemental oxygen in 2011 were 1.4 times lower compared to patients in 2010 (95% CI 1.3-1.6). Similarly, the odds of patients in 2012 receiving supplemental oxygen were 2.3 times lower compared to patients in 2010 (95% CI 2.0-2.6). The odds of receiving supplemental oxygen decreased by 4% for each 1% increase in SpO<subscript>2</subscript> beyond the 94% threshold (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98). Conclusions. The prehospital administration of supplemental O<subscript>2</subscript> decreased significantly following release of the 2010 updated guidelines; however, our data revealed that 50% of patients not meeting criteria for administration still received supplemental O<subscript>2</subscript>. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10903127
Volume :
18
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Prehospital Emergency Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
98285710
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2014.912705