The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom.

In this study, we test theories of judicial retirement developed in the United States to study patterns of retirement in Canada and England. We explore whether there is evidence that justices time their departures to strategically advance partisan or policy goals. Using survival analysis to examine the career patterns of judges appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada (1875-2012),as well as the House of Lords of the United Kingdom (1875-2009),we find that there is no evidence of strategy to achieve political objectives. Instead, these judges either choose to stay as long as possible or retire for personal reasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]