In patients with extensive subcutaneous emphysema, which technique achieves maximal clinical resolution: infraclavicular incisions, subcutaneous drain insertion or suction on in situ chest drain?

MLA

Johnson, Charles H. N., et al. “In Patients with Extensive Subcutaneous Emphysema, Which Technique Achieves Maximal Clinical Resolution: Infraclavicular Incisions, Subcutaneous Drain Insertion or Suction on in Situ Chest Drain?” Interactive Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, vol. 18, no. 6, June 2014, pp. 825–29. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt532.

APA

Johnson, C. H. N., Lang, S. A., Bilal, H., & Rammohan, K. S. (2014). In patients with extensive subcutaneous emphysema, which technique achieves maximal clinical resolution: infraclavicular incisions, subcutaneous drain insertion or suction on in situ chest drain? Interactive Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery, 18(6), 825–829. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt532

Chicago

Johnson, Charles H.N., Sommer A. Lang, Haris Bilal, and Kandadai S. Rammohan. 2014. “In Patients with Extensive Subcutaneous Emphysema, Which Technique Achieves Maximal Clinical Resolution: Infraclavicular Incisions, Subcutaneous Drain Insertion or Suction on in Situ Chest Drain?” Interactive Cardiovascular & Thoracic Surgery 18 (6): 825–29. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivt532.