"NARROWLY TAILORED" AND "DIRECTLY RELATED": HOW THE MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT'S RULING IN TATRO V. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LEAVES POST-SECONDARY STUDENTS POWERLESS TO THE OFTEN BROAD AND INDIRECT RULES OF THEIR PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES.

The article offer information on the judicial decision of the Minnesota Supreme Court in the case of Tatro v. University of Minnesota regarding the protection of a post-secondary student's Internet speech on social networking sites from university regulation under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court held that the University did not violate Tatro's free speech rights.