ACE-I vs angiotensin II receptor antagonists: prevention of renal injury in chronic rat models.

There is now abundant evidence that treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) ameliorates the progression of chronic renal disease. Attention has therefore focused on the role of the renin angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system in mediating the development of progressive glomerulosclerosis and angiotensin II (Ang II) has been implicated in several processes thought to be important in the pathogenesis of this entity. Conversely, ACE is also known to catalyse the breakdown of bradykinin. Thus, ACE-I treatment results in elevated bradykinin levels which may cause selective efferent arteriolar dilatation, suggesting an alternative explanation for the beneficial effects of this class of drugs in chronic renal disease. The development of specific angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists (AT[sub1]RA) has provided a means of testing the relative importance of these two mechanisms. In addition, AT[sub1]RAs differ from ACE-I in their effect on the RAA system in other aspects which may represent therapeutic advantages. This paper reviews studies which have compared ACE-I and AT[sub1]RAs in several rat models of chronic renal disease. Most have found similar beneficial effects including amelioration of proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis, which suggests that the effects of ACE-I are due to a reduction in Ang II activity and not due to increased levels of bradykinin. One long-term study has suggested greater renal protection with candesartan than with enalapril. However, conclusions as regards the relative efficacy of these two groups of agents in ameliorating the progression of chronic renal disease await the results of further long-term studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]