Back to Search
Start Over
Judges as therapists and therapists as judges: the collision of judicial and therapeutic roles in drug treatment courts.
- Source :
- Contemporary Justice Review; Dec2013, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p412-424, 13p
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- This paper explores the implications of the expansion of judicial and therapeutic roles in a drug treatment court (DTC) in Canada. Issues that are raised are: how the courtroom is framed as a therapeutic space where public appearances by participants are part of the therapeutic process; how judges have taken on therapeutic practices, effectively compromising their traditional role as neutral arbiter; how certain women resisted therapeutic interventions by judges and felt they received harsher punishments than men; and how treatment counselors in DTCs are given powers of enforcement over their clients. The collision of judicial and therapeutic roles in the DTC results in negative consequences for individuals in the specialized courts. Specifically, DTC participants are expected to engage in a therapeutic relationship with their treatment counselors and the court; however, their right to confidentiality is withheld, and their treatment counselors act as agents for the court. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- DRUG courts
COURTS
DRUG therapy
JUDGES
THERAPEUTICS
COUNSELOR-client relationship
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10282580
- Volume :
- 16
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Contemporary Justice Review
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 92765632
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2013.857076