Back to Search Start Over

Improvement in coronary haemodynamics after percutaneous coronary intervention: assessment using instantaneous wave-free ratio.

Authors :
Nijjer, Sukhjinder S.
Sen, Sayan
Petraco, Ricardo
Sachdeva, Rajesh
Cuculi, Florim
Escaned, Javier
Broyd, Christopher
Foin, Nicolas
Hadjiloizou, Nearchos
Foale, Rodney A.
Malik, Iqbal
Mikhail, Ghada W.
Sethi, Amarjit S.
Al-Bustami, Mahmud
Kaprielian, Raffi R.
Khan, Masood A.
Baker, Christopher S.
Bellamy, Michael F.
Hughes, Alun D.
Mayet, Jamil
Source :
Heart; Dec2013, Vol. 99 Issue 23, p1740-1748, 9p, 4 Charts, 5 Graphs
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) can detect improvement in stenosis significance after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and compare this with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and whole cycle Pd/Pa. Design: A prospective observational study was undertaken in elective patients scheduled for PCI with FFR ≤0.80. Intracoronary pressures were measured at rest and during adenosine-mediated vasodilatation, before and after PCI. iFR, Pd/Pa and FFR values were calculated using the validated fully automated algorithms. Setting: Coronary catheter laboratories in two UK centres and one in the USA. Patients: 120 coronary stenoses in 112 patients were assessed. The mean age was 63±10 years, while 84% were male; 39% smokers; 33% with diabetes. Mean diameter stenosis was 68±16% by quantitative coronary angiography. Results: Pre-PCI, mean FFR was 0.66±0.14, mean iFR was 0.75±0.21 and mean Pd/Pa 0.83±0.16. PCI increased all indices significantly (FFR 0.89±0.07, p<0.001; iFR 0.94±0.05, p<0.001; Pd/Pa 0.96±0.04, p<0.001). The change in iFR after intervention (0.20 ±0.21) was similar to ?FFR 0.22±0.15 (p=0.25). ?FFR and ?iFR were significantly larger than resting ?Pd/Pa (0.13±0.16, both p<0.001). Similar incremental changes occurred in patients with a higher prevalence of risk factors for microcirculatory disease such as diabetes and hypertension. Conclusions: iFR and FFR detect the changes in coronary haemodynamics elicited by PCI. FFR and iFR have a significantly larger dynamic range than resting Pd/Pa. iFR might be used to objectively document improvement in coronary haemodynamics following PCI in a similar manner to FFR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13556037
Volume :
99
Issue :
23
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Heart
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
91986322
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304387