Engaging the normative question in the H5N1 avian influenza mutation experiments.

Introduction: In recent time there has been ample discussion concerning censorship of research conducted in two labs involved in avian influenza virus research. Much of the debate has centered on the question whether the methods and results should reach to open disclosure given the "dual use" nature of this research which can be used for nefarious purposes. Methods: This paper reviews the discussion to date but centers on epistemological issues associated with initial justification of this research and what this entails for continuation of this research despite US governmental biosecurity concerns. The question here is whether there was reasonable moral warrant for genetic alteration of the H5N1 influenza virus. Conclusion: The paper concludes with philosophical (ethical) justification for continuation of this research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]