Occurrence of Spontaneous Amphophilic-Vacuolar Renal Tubule Tumors in Sprague-Dawley Rats from Subchronic Toxicity Studies.

The low background incidence of tumors in rodents from subchronic toxicity studies makes it difficult to assess their relevance, especially when present only in treated animals. This report investigates the occurrence of renal tubule tumors (RTTs), specifically the amphophilic-vacuolar (AV) phenotypic variant, in young Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats from a survey of laboratories conducting subchronic toxicity studies spanning a period of 10 years (2002–2012). This survey establishes a general profile of tumor occurrence; it does not estimate overall incidence or prevalence. AV tumors are spontaneous, nontreatment-related tumors of familial origin, and morphologically distinct from conventional RTTs induced by exposure to renal carcinogens. They are composed of distinct lobules of large, round to polyhedral cells with vacuolated amphophilic to eosinophilic cytoplasm and prominent nucleoli. Data from five collaborating laboratories, representing 37 qualifying studies, are presented. In total, 58 renal tubule neoplasms were recorded in this data set. The AV tumor variant was reported more commonly than the conventional RTT (n = 45 and 13, respectively), and it was recorded in both experimental (n = 32) and control (n = 13) groups. AV tumors occurred more often in females (n = 34) than in males (n = 11); conventional RTTs were recorded more often in males (n = 9) than in females (n = 4). AV tumors often occurred in more than one rat within the same study (up to 7) and were documented to occur in rats as young as 7 to 10 weeks of age. Results from this survey indicate that AV tumors are being reported more commonly in recent years; the majority (n = 33) were reported in studies commencing since 2009. In conclusion, this study reaffirms that AV tumors are spontaneous, nontreatment-related lesions, and suggests that they may be more common than conventional RTTs in young SD rats. The authors propose that AV tumors be recorded separately from conventional RTTs in order to clearly distinguish these two renal tubule neoplasms from one another and allow for appropriate interpretation of a compound’s potential carcinogenic effect in the kidney. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]