Back to Search Start Over

How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany.

Authors :
Sheaff, Rod
Chambers, Naomi
Charles, Nigel
Exworthy, Mark
Mahon, Ann
Byng, Richard
Mannion, Russell
Source :
BMC Health Services Research; 2013, Vol. 13 Issue Suppl 1, p1-10, 10p, 1 Chart
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

Background: In quasi-markets governance over healthcare providers is mediated by commissioners. Different commissioners apply different combinations of six methods of control ('media of power') for exercising governance: managerial performance, negotiation, discursive control, incentives, competition and juridical control. This paper compares how English and German healthcare commissioners do so. Methods: Systematic comparison of observational national-level case studies in terms of six media of power, using data from multiple sources. Results: The comparison exposes and contrasts two basic generic modes of commissioning: 1. Surrogate planning (English NHS), in which a negotiated order involving micro-commissioning, provider competition, financial incentives and penalties are the dominant media of commissioner power over providers. 2. Case-mix commissioning (Germany), in which managerial performance, an 'episode based' negotiated order and juridical controls appear the dominant media of commissioner power. Conclusions: Governments do not necessarily maximise commissioners' power over providers by implementing as many media of power as possible because these media interact, some complementing and others inhibiting each other. In particular, patient choice of provider inhibits commissioners' use of provider competition as a means of control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14726963
Volume :
13
Issue :
Suppl 1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Health Services Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
87974483
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S8