Back to Search Start Over

Four-Center Oxidation State Combinations and Near-Infrared Absorption in [Ru(pap)(Q)2] n (Q=3,5-Di- tert-butyl- N-aryl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine, pap=2-Phenylazopyridine).

Authors :
Das, Dipanwita
Agarwala, Hemlata
Chowdhury, Abhishek Dutta
Patra, Tuhin
Mobin, Shaikh M.
Sarkar, Biprajit
Kaim, Wolfgang
Lahiri, Goutam Kumar
Source :
Chemistry - A European Journal; Jun2013, Vol. 19 Issue 23, p7384-7394, 11p
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

The complex series [Ru(pap)(Q)<subscript>2</subscript>]<superscript> n</superscript> ([ 1]<superscript> n</superscript>-[ 4]<superscript> n</superscript>; n=+2, +1, 0, −1, −2) contains four redox non-innocent entities: one ruthenium ion, 2-phenylazopyridine (pap), and two o-iminoquinone moieties, Q=3,5-di- tert-butyl- N-aryl-1,2-benzoquinonemonoimine (aryl=C<subscript>6</subscript>H<subscript>5</subscript> ( 1<superscript>+</superscript>); m-(Cl)<subscript>2</subscript>C<subscript>6</subscript>H<subscript>3</subscript> ( 2<superscript>+</superscript>); m-(OCH<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>C<subscript>6</subscript>H<subscript>3</subscript> ( 3<superscript>+</superscript>); m-( tBu)<subscript>2</subscript>C<subscript>6</subscript>H<subscript>3</subscript> ( 4<superscript>+</superscript>)). A crystal structure determination of the representative compound, [ 1]ClO<subscript>4</subscript>, established the crystallization of the ctt-isomeric form, that is, cis and trans with respect to the mutual orientations of O and N donors of two Q ligands, and the coordinating azo N atom trans to the O donor of Q. The sensitive CO (average: 1.299(3) Å), CN (average: 1.346(4) Å) and intra-ring CC ( meta; average: 1.373(4) Å) bond lengths of the coordinated iminoquinone moieties in corroboration with the NN length (1.292(3) Å) of pap in 1<superscript>+</superscript> establish [Ru<superscript>III</superscript>(pap<superscript>0</superscript>)(Q<superscript>.−</superscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>]<superscript>+</superscript> as the most appropriate electronic structural form. The coupling of three spins from one low-spin ruthenium(III) (t<subscript>2g</subscript><superscript>5</superscript>) and two Q<superscript>.−</superscript> radicals in 1<superscript>+</superscript>- 4<superscript>+</superscript> gives a ground state with one unpaired electron on Q<superscript>.−</superscript>, as evident from g=1.995 radical-type EPR signals for 1<superscript>+</superscript>- 4<superscript>+</superscript>. Accordingly, the DFT-calculated Mulliken spin densities of 1<superscript>+</superscript> (1.152 for two Q, Ru: −0.179, pap: 0.031) confirm Q-based spin. Complex ions 1<superscript>+</superscript>- 4<superscript>+</superscript> exhibit two near-IR absorption bands at about λ=2000 and 920 nm in addition to intense multiple transitions covering the visible to UV regions; compounds [ 1]ClO<subscript>4</subscript>-[ 4]ClO<subscript>4</subscript> undergo one oxidation and three separate reduction processes within ±2.0 V versus SCE. The crystal structure of the neutral (one-electron reduced) state ( 2) was determined to show metal-based reduction and an EPR signal at g=1.996. The electronic transitions of the complexes 1<superscript> n</superscript>- 4<superscript> n</superscript> ( n=+2, +1, 0, −1, −2) in the UV, visible, and NIR regions, as determined by using spectroelectrochemistry, have been analyzed by TD-DFT calculations and reveal significant low-energy absorbance ( λ<subscript>max</subscript>>1000 nm) for cations, anions, and neutral forms. The experimental studies in combination with DFT calculations suggest the dominant valence configurations of 1<superscript> n</superscript>- 4<superscript> n</superscript> in the accessible redox states to be [Ru<superscript>III</superscript>(pap<superscript>0</superscript>)(Q<superscript>.−</superscript>)(Q<superscript>0</superscript>)]<superscript>2+</superscript> ( 1<superscript>2+</superscript>- 4<superscript>2+</superscript>)→[Ru<superscript>III</superscript>(pap<superscript>0</superscript>)(Q<superscript>.−</superscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>]<superscript>+</superscript> ( 1<superscript>+</superscript>- 4<superscript>+</superscript>)→[Ru<superscript>II</superscript>(pap<superscript>0</superscript>)(Q<superscript>.−</superscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>] ( 1- 4)→[Ru<superscript>II</superscript>(pap<superscript>.−</superscript>)(Q<superscript>.−</superscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>]<superscript>−</superscript> ( 1<superscript>−</superscript>- 4<superscript>−</superscript>)→[Ru<superscript>III</superscript>(pap<superscript>.−</superscript>)(Q<superscript>2−</superscript>)<subscript>2</subscript>]<superscript>2−</superscript> ( 1<superscript>2−</superscript>- 4<superscript>2−</superscript>). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09476539
Volume :
19
Issue :
23
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Chemistry - A European Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
87733539
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201204620