Back to Search Start Over

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of recurrent bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors :
Al‐Ibraheem, Akram
Buck, Andreas K.
Benz, Matthias R.
Rudert, Maximilian
Beer, Ambros J.
Mansour, Asem
Pomykala, Kelsey L.
Haller, Bernhard
Juenger, Hendrik
Scheidhauer, Klemens
Schwaiger, Markus
Herrmann, Ken
Source :
Cancer (0008543X); Mar2013, Vol. 119 Issue 6, p1227-1234, 8p
Publication Year :
2013

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of modern hybrid imaging modalities for detecting recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma remains to be determined. In this report, the authors present a clinical study on the diagnostic accuracy and incremental value of integrated <superscript>18</superscript>F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (<superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT) in patients with a history of sarcoma who have clinically suspected disease recurrence. METHODS: Forty-three patients who had a history of bone or soft tissue sarcoma and had documented complete remission underwent <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT. Image analysis was performed independently for <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET (n = 43) and for contrast-enhanced spiral CT (CE-CT) (n = 30) by 2 separate readers, whereas combined <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT (n = 43) images were analyzed in consensus by both readers. Imaging findings were rated on a 5-point scale and finally were reported as malignant, benign, or equivocal. Imaging findings were validated either by histopathology (n = 24) or by clinical follow-up (n = 19). RESULTS: <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT had greater sensitivity and specificity compared with CE-CT alone (94% and 92% vs 78% and 67%, respectively), resulting in significantly greater accuracy (93% vs 73%; P = .03). <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT was particularly superior regarding detection of local recurrence or soft tissue lesions (sensitivity and specificity: 83% and 100% vs 50% and 100%, respectively) or bone metastases (100% and 100% vs 85% and 88%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT had greater diagnostic accuracy in the detection of recurrent bone or soft tissue sarcoma compared with CE-CT alone. The detection of local recurrence was the most evident advantage of <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT over CE-CT. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0008543X
Volume :
119
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer (0008543X)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
85871965
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.27866