Back to Search
Start Over
The patient satisfaction chasm: the gap between hospital management and frontline clinicians.
- Source :
- BMJ Quality & Safety; Mar2013, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p242-250, 9p, 3 Charts, 2 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Background Achieving high levels of patient satisfaction requires hospital management to be proactive in patient-centred care improvement initiatives and to engage frontline clinicians in this process. Method We developed a survey to assess the attitudes of clinicians towards hospital management activities with respect to improving patient satisfaction and surveyed clinicians in four academic hospitals located in Denmark, Israel, the UK and the USA. Results We collected 1004 questionnaires (79.9% response rate) from four hospitals in four countries on three continents. Overall, 90.4% of clinicians believed that improving patient satisfaction during hospitalisation was achievable, but only 9.2% of clinicians thought their department had a structured plan to do so, with significant differences between the countries (p<0.0001). Among responders, only 38% remembered targeted actions to improve patient satisfaction and just 34% stated having received feedback from hospital management regarding patient satisfaction status in their department during the past year. In multivariate analyses, clinicians who received feedback from hospital management and remembered targeted actions to improve patient satisfaction were more likely to state that their department had a structured plan to improve patient satisfaction. Conclusions This portrait of clinicians' attitudes highlights a chasm between hospital management and frontline clinicians with respect to improving patient satisfaction. It appears that while hospital management asserts that patientcentred care is important and invests in patient satisfaction and patient experience surveys, our findings suggest that the majority do not have a structured plan for promoting improvement of patient satisfaction and engaging clinicians in the process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- QUALITY assurance
ACADEMIC medical centers
ANALYSIS of variance
ATTITUDE (Psychology)
CHI-squared test
COMPARATIVE studies
CONFIDENCE intervals
EPIDEMIOLOGY
HEALTH facility administration
MEDICAL cooperation
MEDICAL personnel
MULTIVARIATE analysis
PATIENT satisfaction
QUESTIONNAIRES
RESEARCH
RESEARCH funding
STATISTICS
SURVEYS
LOGISTIC regression analysis
ORGANIZATIONAL structure
DATA analysis
PLANNING techniques
PATIENT-centered care
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 20445415
- Volume :
- 22
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 85696119
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001045