Back to Search Start Over

The large variation in organic carbon consumption in spring in the East China Sea.

Authors :
Chen, C.-C.
Gong, G.-C.
Shiah, F.-K.
Chou, W.-C.
Hung, C.-C.
Source :
Biogeosciences Discussions; 2012, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p16533-16564, 32p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

A tremendous amount of organic carbon respired by planktonic communities has been found in summer in the East China Sea (ECS), and this rate has been significantly correlated with fluvial discharge from the Changjiang River. However, data related to this issue in other seasons have rarely been collected. To evaluate and reveal the potential controlling mechanism of organic carbon consumption in spring in the ECS, research using stations covering almost the entire ECS shelf was conducted in the spring of 2009 and 2010. During both periods, the fluvial discharges were similar, and these rates were comparable to high riverine flow in summer. Interestingly, planktonic community respiration (CR) varied widely in both springs; in 2009, the level of CR was double that of 2010, with mean (±SD) values of 111.7 (±76.3) and 50.7 (±62.9)mgCm<superscript>-3</superscript> d<superscript>-1</superscript> , respectively. The CR was positively linearly regressed with concentrations of particulate organic carbon and/or chlorophyll a (Chl a) in 2009 (all p < 0.01). These results suggest that the rate was dependent on planktonic activities, especially that of phytoplankton, in 2009. During this period, phytoplankton growth flourished due to allochthonous nutrients discharged from the Changjiang River. Furthermore, higher phytoplankton growth leaded to the absorption of an enormous amount of fugacity of CO<subscript>2</subscript> (fCO<subscript>2</subscript>) in the surface waters, even with a significant amount of inorganic carbon regenerated via CR. In 2010, there were even more riverine runoff nutrients into the ECS than in 2009. Surprisingly, the growth of phytoplankton in 2010 was not stimulated by enriched nutrients, and its growth was likely limited by low water temperature and/or low light intensity. Low temperature might also suppress planktonic metabolism, and this could explain why the CR was lower in 2010. During this period, lower surface water fCO<subscript>2</subscript> might have mainly been driven by physical process(es). To conclude, these results indicate that organic carbon consumption (i.e. CR) in the ECS in spring might be controlled by the magnitude of planktonic activities and physical factor (e.g. temperature), and that the latter is especially important during a cold spring season. This further suggests that the high intraseasonal variability of organic carbon consumption needs to be kept in mind when budgeting the annual carbon balance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18106277
Volume :
9
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Biogeosciences Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
84012815
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-9-16533-2012