The relative importance of decomposition and transport mechanisms in accounting for C profiles.

Soil is the major terrestrial reservoirs of carbon, and a substantial part of this carbon is stored in deep layers, typically deeper than 50 cm below the surface. Several studies underlined the quantitative importance of this deep Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) pool and models are needed to better understand this stock and its evolution under climate and land-uses changes. In this study, we test and compare 3 simple theoretical models of vertical transport for SOC against SOC profiles measurements from a long-term bare fallow experiment carried out by the Central-Chernozem State Natural Biosphere Reserve named after V.V. Alekhin, in the Kursk Region of Russia. The transport schemes tested are diffusion, advection or both diffusion and advection. They are coupled to two different formulations of soil carbon decomposition kinetics. The first formulation is a first order kinetics widely used in global SOC decomposition models; the second one links SOC decomposition rate to the amount of fresh organic matter, representing a "priming effect". Field data are from a set of three bare fallow plots where soil received no input during the past 20, 26 and 58 yr respectively. Parameters of the models were optimized using a Bayesian method. The best results are obtained when SOC decomposition is assumed to be controlled by fresh organic matter. In comparison to the first-order kinetic model, the "priming" model reduces the underestimation of SOC decomposition in the top layers and the over estimation in the deep layers. We also observe that the transport scheme that improved the fit with the data depends on the soil carbon mineralization formulation chosen. When soil carbon decomposition is modelled to depend on the fresh organic matter amount, the transport mechanisms which improves best the fit to the SOC profile data is the model representing both advection and diffusion. Interestingly, the older the bare fallow is, the lesser the need for diffusion is. This suggests that stabilized carbon may not be transported within the profile by the same mechanisms than more labile carbon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]