Back to Search
Start Over
Women's reported weight: is there a discrepancy?
- Source :
- Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine; Aug2012, Vol. 25 Issue 8, p1395-1398, 4p
- Publication Year :
- 2012
-
Abstract
- Objective: To compare self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & delivery weight with documented pre-pregnancy & delivery weight and determine whether there are differences compared with the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) guidelines. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 234 women. Inclusion criteria included documented height, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight, self-reported delivery weight, documented pre-pregnancy weight ± 12 weeks from last menstrual period, and documented delivery weight ± 2 weeks from delivery. We determined the difference between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight vs. documented pre-pregnancy weight and self-reported delivery weight vs. documented delivery weight. Using documented pre-pregnancy weight and documented delivery weight, we calculated gestational weight gain (GWG) relative to IOM criteria. Results: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight was 2.94 kg less than documented pre-pregnancy weight ( p < 0.0001). Self-reported BMI was 1.11 mg/kg<superscript>2</superscript> less than documented BMI ( p < 0.0001). Self-reported GWG was 3.01 kg greater than documented GWG ( p < 0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of normal weight correctly classified pregravid BMI in contrast to 86% of obese ( p < 0.005) and 73% of overweight ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Overweight and obese women underestimated self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & overestimated GWG, thereby mistakenly categorizing IOM guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- WEIGHT gain in pregnancy
MENSTRUATION
OBESITY in women
DELIVERY (Obstetrics)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14767058
- Volume :
- 25
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 77733802
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.636099