Back to Search Start Over

Women's reported weight: is there a discrepancy?

Authors :
Mandujano, Alicia
Huston-Presley, Larraine
Waters, Thaddeus P.
Catalano, Patrick M.
Source :
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine; Aug2012, Vol. 25 Issue 8, p1395-1398, 4p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objective: To compare self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & delivery weight with documented pre-pregnancy & delivery weight and determine whether there are differences compared with the Institute of Medicine's (IOM) guidelines. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 234 women. Inclusion criteria included documented height, self-reported pre-pregnancy weight, self-reported delivery weight, documented pre-pregnancy weight ± 12 weeks from last menstrual period, and documented delivery weight ± 2 weeks from delivery. We determined the difference between self-reported pre-pregnancy weight vs. documented pre-pregnancy weight and self-reported delivery weight vs. documented delivery weight. Using documented pre-pregnancy weight and documented delivery weight, we calculated gestational weight gain (GWG) relative to IOM criteria. Results: Self-reported pre-pregnancy weight was 2.94 kg less than documented pre-pregnancy weight ( p < 0.0001). Self-reported BMI was 1.11 mg/kg<superscript>2</superscript> less than documented BMI ( p < 0.0001). Self-reported GWG was 3.01 kg greater than documented GWG ( p < 0.0001). Ninety-eight percent of normal weight correctly classified pregravid BMI in contrast to 86% of obese ( p < 0.005) and 73% of overweight ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Overweight and obese women underestimated self-reported pre-pregnancy weight & overestimated GWG, thereby mistakenly categorizing IOM guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14767058
Volume :
25
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
77733802
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.636099