Back to Search Start Over

Home Rule as a ‘crisis of public conscience’.

Authors :
Biagini, Eugenio F.
Source :
British Democracy & Irish Nationalism 1876-1906; 2007, Vol. 1 Issue 2, p1-49, 49p
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

Ireland can no longer be governed by the suspension of the safeguards of popular liberty, unless we are prepared to make their suspension the rule rather than the exception. During the past five years … [he] has been regarded as the loyal Liberal, and he alone, who followed Mr Gladstone w[h]ithersoever he went … The great Liberal Party has no creed but Gladstoneism [sic]. This is at once its strength and its weakness. Crisis? What crisis? ‘I need scarcely mention that the ministers and religious bodies of all denominations were against us … Perhaps, after all, the strongest force against me in the fight was that … it was decided that the Irish vote should go Liberal.’ The frustration expressed in these words by a disgruntled candidate reflected a common experience among Independent Labour Party (ILP) parliamentary candidates during the thirty years following the 1886 Home Rule crisis. Yet most historians have argued that the Gladstonian campaign to secure Irish self-government failed to move working-class electors. Indeed, Gladstone's adoption of this cause is generally regarded as one of his worst mistakes, brought about by his wish to retain the party leadership and resist the rising tide of social reform – which Joseph Chamberlain and other ‘advanced Liberals’ felt to be absolutely necessary if the party was to retain its popular following. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISBNs :
9780521180917
Volume :
1
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
British Democracy & Irish Nationalism 1876-1906
Publication Type :
Book
Accession number :
77233740
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511495700.002