Back to Search Start Over

Universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus in Emilia-Romagna.

Authors :
Berardi, Alberto
Di Fazzio, Giorgia
Gavioli, Sara
Di Grande, Ezio
Groppi, Alessandra
Papa, Irene
Piccinini, Giancarlo
Simoni, Angela
Tridapalli, Elisabetta
Volta, Alessandro
Facchinetti, Fabio
Ferrari, Fabrizio
Source :
Journal of Medical Screening; Jun2011, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p60-64, 5p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of severe infections in newborns. Intrapartum antibiotic chemoprophylaxis (IAP) reduces the rate of early-onset disease. The aim of this study is to determine the degree of clinicians' compliance with the suggested protocol for GBS prevention in Emilia-Romagna (Italy). Methods Characteristics of each delivery were prospectively recorded in the period between October 2005 to December 2005. Standardized pro-forma were used to collect data. Results Among 5118 babies, 7.2% (369) were preterm and 92.3% were born at term (4749). Antenatal screening was performed in 86.6% of women who delivered at term, of which 18.1% were GBS culture-positive. Information regarding culture site was available in 93.2% of women screened and recto-vaginal cultures were documented in 42.7%. IAP was administered to 28.7% of 3937 women at term who had either spontaneous delivery or emergency caesarean section. In this cohort, 15.9% were diagnosed GBS culture-positive, of which 92.6% received IAP. Prophylaxis was also administered to 8.4% (331) of women for no apparent reason. Compared with tertiary level hospitals, women delivering in primary/secondary hospitals were more likely to be both GBS screened (P < 0.0001; OR 3.04; CI 2.33-3.97) and to receive prophylaxis ≥4 hours before delivery (P = 0.0025; OR 1.57; CI 1.17-2.12). Conclusions GBS screening was performed in >85% of women and >90% of culture-positive women received prophylaxis. However, there is a need to educate clinicians about protocol adherence, as most cultures were suboptimal and cases of unnecessary IAP were administered. The screening was more effective in hospitals with fewer deliveries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09691413
Volume :
18
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Medical Screening
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
74207788
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2011.011023