Back to Search Start Over

Methane emissions from soils: synthesis and analysis of a large UK data set.

Authors :
Levy, Peter E.
Burden, Annette
Cooper, Mark D. A.
Dinsmore, Kerry J.
Drewer, Julia
Evans, Chris
Fowler, David
Gaiawyn, Jenny
Gray, Alan
Jones, Stephanie K.
Jones, Timothy
McNamara, Niall P.
Mills, Robert
Ostle, Nick
Sheppard, Lucy J.
Skiba, Ute
Sowerby, Alwyn
Ward, Susan E.
Zieliński, Piotr
Source :
Global Change Biology; May2012, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p1657-1669, 13p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Nearly 5000 chamber measurements of CH<subscript>4</subscript> flux were collated from 21 sites across the United Kingdom, covering a range of soil and vegetation types, to derive a parsimonious model that explains as much of the variability as possible, with the least input requirements. Mean fluxes ranged from −0.3 to 27.4 nmol CH<subscript>4</subscript> m<superscript>−2</superscript> s<superscript>−1</superscript>, with small emissions or low rates of net uptake in mineral soils (site means of −0.3 to 0.7 nmol m<superscript>−2</superscript> s<superscript>−1</superscript>) and much larger emissions from organic soils (site means of −0.3 to 27.4 nmol m<superscript>−2</superscript> s<superscript>−1</superscript>). Less than half of the observed variability in instantaneous fluxes could be explained by independent variables measured. The reasons for this include measurement error, stochastic processes and, probably most importantly, poor correspondence between the independent variables measured and the actual variables influencing the processes underlying methane production, transport and oxidation. When temporal variation was accounted for, and the fluxes averaged at larger spatial scales, simple models explained up to ca. 75% of the variance in CH<subscript>4</subscript> fluxes. Soil carbon, peat depth, soil moisture and pH together provided the best sub-set of explanatory variables. However, where plant species composition data were available, this provided the highest explanatory power. Linear and nonlinear models generally fitted the data equally well, with the exception that soil moisture required a power transformation. To estimate the impact of changes in peatland water table on CH<subscript>4</subscript> emissions in the United Kingdom, an emission factor of +0.4 g CH<subscript>4</subscript> m<superscript>−2</superscript> yr<superscript>−1</superscript> per cm increase in water table height was derived from the data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13541013
Volume :
18
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Global Change Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
74103551
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02616.x