Back to Search Start Over

Quantification techniques to minimize the effects of native T1 variation and B1 inhomogeneity in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.

Authors :
Azlan, Che A.
Ahearn, Trevor S.
Di Giovanni, Pierluigi
Semple, Scott I. K.
Gilbert, Fiona J.
Redpath, Thomas W.
Source :
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; Feb2012, Vol. 67 Issue 2, p531-540, 10p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

The variation of the native T<subscript>1</subscript> ( T<subscript>10</subscript>) of different tissues and B<subscript>1</subscript> transmission-field inhomogeneity at 3 T are major contributors of errors in the quantification of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. To address these issues, we have introduced new enhancement indices derived from saturation-recovery snapshot-FLASH (SRSF) images. The stability of the new indices, i.e., the SRSF enhancement factor (EF<subscript>SRSF</subscript>) and its simplified version (EF′<subscript>SRSF</subscript>) with respect to differences in T<subscript>10</subscript> and B<subscript>1</subscript> inhomogeneity was compared against a typical index used in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, i.e., the enhancement ratio (ER), by using computer simulations. Imaging experiments with Gd-DTPA-doped gel phantoms and a female volunteer were also performed. A lower error was observed in the new indices compared to enhancement ratio in the presence of typical T<subscript>10</subscript> variation and B<subscript>1</subscript> inhomogeneity. At changes of relaxation rate (Δ R<subscript>1</subscript>) of 8 s<superscript>−1</superscript>, the differences between a T<subscript>10</subscript> of 1266 and 566 ms are <1, 12, and 58%, respectively, for EF<subscript>SRSF</subscript>, EF′<subscript>SRSF</subscript>, and ER, whereas differences of 20, 8, and 51%, respectively, result from a 50% B<subscript>1</subscript> field reduction at the same Δ R<subscript>1</subscript>. These quantification techniques may be a solution to minimize the effect of T<subscript>10</subscript> variation and B<subscript>1</subscript> inhomogeneity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07403194
Volume :
67
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
70602257
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23021