Back to Search
Start Over
Comparative Study of Surgical Margins and Cosmetic Outcome in Lumpectomy versus Segmental Resection in Breast Cancer.
- Source :
- European Surgical Research; 2011, Vol. 47 Issue 4, p231-239, 9p, 1 Diagram, 3 Charts
- Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Objective: The aim of the present retrospective study was to compare two breast-conserving techniques, segmental resection and standard lumpectomy, for the treatment of breast cancer regarding their oncological safety. Quality of life aspects were evaluated by assessing the respective postsurgical cosmetic results. Patients and Methods: 190 women with breast cancer located in the superior and lateral quadrant were included in the study. Sixty patients were treated with segmental resection (group 1), whereas 130 underwent standard lumpectomy (group 2). Tumor sizes were determined and excised tissue specimens were analyzed for positive or negative resection margins. Patients were given a 16-item questionnaire for the postsurgical self-assessment of the cosmetic outcome. Results: No statistically significant difference was found concerning the number of positive resection margins between the groups (25 vs. 30%, p = 0.46). Exceptions were ventral margins, which predominated in group 2 (p = 0.016). Group 1 revealed a significantly larger maximum tumor size with negative margins as compared to group 2 (26.6 vs. 17.0 mm). General satisfaction with the cosmetic results was comparable between groups. Conclusions: Segmental resection surgery, as a method of breast conservation therapy, can be used to treat larger breast lesions as compared to standard lumpectomy. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- BREAST cancer surgery
SURGICAL excision
LUMPECTOMY
CANCER treatment
BREAST surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0014312X
- Volume :
- 47
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- European Surgical Research
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 67681067
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000333090