Back to Search Start Over

Value of precontrast T1 for dGEMRIC of native articular cartilage.

Authors :
Li, Wei
Du, Hongyan
Scheidegger, Rachel
Wu, Ying
Prasad, Pottumarti V.
Source :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Feb2009, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p494-497, 4p
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate if the difference between pre- and post-Gd-DTPA<superscript>2-</superscript> relaxation rate (ΔR<subscript>1</subscript>) provides better differentiation of osteoarthritic patients (OA) from healthy subjects (HS) with dGEMRIC, as compared to post-Gd-DTPA<superscript>2-</superscript> spin-lattice relaxation time (T<subscript>1Gd</subscript>). Materials and Methods Seventeen OA and 14 HS underwent pre- and 90 minutes postcontrast (Gd-DTPA<superscript>2-</superscript>) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee, using inversion recovery fast spin-echo and/or Lock-Locker sequences for T<subscript>1</subscript> mapping. Effect sizes for T<subscript>1pre</subscript>, T<subscript>1Gd</subscript>, and ΔR<subscript>1</subscript> were calculated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and regression analysis were also performed to assess the effectiveness of each parameter in the separation of OA and HS. Results T<subscript>1Gd</subscript> and ΔR<subscript>1</subscript> were almost identical in terms of areas under ROC curves (0.903 and 0.914, respectively), and effect sizes (1.34 and 1.31, respectively). These were significantly higher than T<subscript>1pre</subscript>. In addition, a high inverse correlation was observed between ΔR<subscript>1</subscript> vs. T<subscript>1Gd</subscript> (R = 0.96). Conclusion Either T<subscript>1Gd</subscript> or ΔR<subscript>1</subscript> could be used as an index in the evaluation of native cartilage. However, considering the practical logistical cost involved in terms of time and effort to acquire precontrast T<subscript>1</subscript> measurements, our data further support the continued use of T<subscript>1Gd</subscript> as the dGEMRIC index in the evaluation of native cartilage. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;29:494-497. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10531807
Volume :
29
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
64916632
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21658