Back to Search
Start Over
Is mechanical soil aeration a strategy to alleviate soil compaction and decrease phosphorus and suspended sediment losses from irrigated and rain-fed cattle-grazed pastures?
- Source :
- Soil Use & Management; Sep2011, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p376-384, 11p, 2 Charts, 4 Graphs
- Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Agriculture is a major source of phosphorus (P) and suspended sediment (SS) losses to aquatic ecosystems promoting eutrophication. Mechanical soil loosening equipments such as topsoil looseners or aerators have been reported to improve the physical quality and infiltration of soils susceptible to livestock damage resulting from treading. We hypothesized that soil aeration would significantly decrease the volume of surface runoff and consequent losses of P and SS compared with non-aerated soil (control) in cattle-grazed pasture on a poorly structured silt-loam soil. Hydrologically isolated plots (2 m long × 1 m wide × 0.15 m deep) were installed in aerated and control plots to collect surface runoff following irrigation or rainfall and analysed for P and SS losses for 1 year. Soil physical properties [% macroporosity, bulk density, saturated hydraulic conductivity ( K<subscript>sat</subscript>) and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity ( K<subscript>unsat</subscript> at −1kPa)] were measured in the aerated and control treatments and taken before each irrigation event ( n = 12). Six months after mechanical aeration was employed, but before cattle grazing commenced, no significant differences in soil physical quality were found between aerated and control treatments, with the exception of a minor increase in K<subscript>unsat</subscript> for the control plots. This lack of treatment difference continued after grazing and was largely attributed to the re-settling of the poorly structured and dispersive soil. Flow-weighted mean concentrations and annual loads of dissolved reactive P (DRP) on the mechanically aerated soil (2.24 kg DRP/ha) were approximately double those from the control treatment (1.20 kg DRP/ha). However, no significant differences were observed between treatments for surface runoff volumes and losses of total P and total SS, which may reflect the similar soil physical conditions exhibited between treatments throughout most of the trial. As observed elsewhere, time (days) since grazing or fertilizer application was found to influence P and/or SS losses. We conclude that aeration did not decrease P and SS losses. Any changes in soil physical properties such as macroporosity were short-lived and therefore unlikely to influence surface runoff and subsequent P and SS losses for this soil type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 02660032
- Volume :
- 27
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Soil Use & Management
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 64902403
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2011.00345.x