RJCCI V. DESTEFINO AND DISPARATE TREATMENT: HOW THE CASE MAKES TITLE VAND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE UNWORKABLE.

The article discusses the court case Ricci v. DeStefano which leads to several disturbing questions about employment and equal protection in the U.S. It explains the anti-subordination and anti-classification principle and how the case changed the definition of disparate treatment. It also cites the limitations on the scope of the case in aspects of vested rights and race-consciousness and the impossibility of relief used by Ricci that makes the Title VII and Equal Protection Clause unworkable.