Back to Search Start Over

The Difference of the Impacts of Surgical Approaches on Cellular Immunity in Patients with Uterine Malignancies: A Comparative Study of Laparoscopy and Laparotomy Surgery.

Authors :
Nawei Zhang
Haiyan Liu
Zhenyu Zhang
Shuzhen Wang
Shuli Guo
Source :
Gynecologic & Obstetric Investigation; Apr2011, Vol. 71 Issue 3, p177-182, 6p, 4 Charts
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Objective: To explore the impact of laparoscopy and laparotomy surgery on cellular immunity in patients with malignant uterine tumors. Methods: Thirty-eight women with uterine malignancies were enrolled in a prospective nonrandomized cohort study. Either laparoscopy or laparotomy was performed according to the patients' choice. The frequency of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells derived from peripheral venous blood was evaluated by flow cytometry. Results: (1) Postoperatively, there was a decrease in the number of lymphocyte counts, especially after laparotomy, on the first postoperative day (p < 0.01). (2) Compared with preoperative levels, the frequencies of CD3+ and CD4+ cells and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio were declined both in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups on postoperative day 1 (p < 0.01). (3) The frequencies of CD3+ and CD4+ cells and the ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ cells were less depressed in the laparoscopy group on the first postoperative day (p < 0.05). (4) The frequency of natural killer cells increased, both in the laparoscopy and laparotomy groups on the first postoperative day (p < 0.01), but there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Cellular immunity was temporally depressed in patients with uterine malignancy after surgical treatment, but laparoscopic surgery depressed the immunity less than laparotomy. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03787346
Volume :
71
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Gynecologic & Obstetric Investigation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
60113468
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000317255