Back to Search Start Over

Cardiac resynchronization therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors :
Wells, George
Parkash, Ratika
Healey, Jeffrey S.
Talajic, Mario
Arnold, J. Malcolm
Sullivan, Shannon
Peterson, Joan
Yetisir, Elizabeth
Theoret-Patrick, Patricia
Luce, Marilynn
Tang, Anthony S. L.
Source :
Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ); 3/8/2011, Vol. 183 Issue 4, p421-429, 9p
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

Background: Studies of cardiac resynchronization therapy in addition to an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure had not been shown to reduce mortality until the recent RAFT trial (Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial). We performed a meta-analysis including the RAFT trial to determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implant able defibrillator on mortality. Methods: We searched electronic databases and other sources for reports of randomized trials using a parallel or crossover design. We included studies involving patients with heart failure receiving optimal medical therapy that compared cardiac resynchronization therapy with optimal medical therapy alone, or cardiac resynchronization therapy plus an implantable defibrillator with a standard implantable defibrillator. The primary outcome was mortality. The optimum information size was considered to assess the minimum amount of information required in the literature to reach reliable conclusions about cardiac resynchronization therapy. Results: Of 3071 reports identified, 12 studies (n = 7538) were included in our meta- analysis. Compared with optimal medical therapy alone, cardiac resynchronization therapy plus optimal medical therapy significantly reduced mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62-0.85). Compared with an implantable defibrillator alone, cardiac resynchronization therapy plus an implantable defibrillator significantly reduced mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.96). This last finding remained significant among patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I or II disease (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.96) but not among those with class III or IV disease (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.69-1.07). Analysis of the optimum information size showed that the sequential monitoring boundary was crossed, which suggests no need for further clinical trials. Interpretation: The cumulative evidence is now conclusive that the addition of cardiac resynchronization to optimal medical therapy or defibrillator therapy significantly reduces mortality among patients with heart failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
Volume :
183
Issue :
4
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
59403219
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101685