How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?

MLA

Middel, Berrie, et al. “How to Validate Clinically Important Change in Health-Related Functional Status. Is the Magnitude of the Effect Size Consistently Related to Magnitude of Change as Indicated by a Global Question Rating?” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol. 7, no. 4, Nov. 2001, pp. 399–410. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00298.x.

APA

Middel, B., Stewart, R., Bouma, J., Sonderen, E. van, & Heuvel, W. J. A. van den. (2001). How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00298.x

Chicago

Middel, Berrie, Roy Stewart, Jelte Bouma, Eric van Sonderen, and Wim J. A. van den Heuvel. 2001. “How to Validate Clinically Important Change in Health-Related Functional Status. Is the Magnitude of the Effect Size Consistently Related to Magnitude of Change as Indicated by a Global Question Rating?” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (4): 399–410. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00298.x.