Should trichiasis surgery be offered in the village? A community randomised trial of village vs. health centre-based surgery.

<bold>Introduction: </bold>Surgery for trachomatous trichiasis prevents blindness and is advocated by the WHO as part of the SAFE strategy for the global elimination of trachoma. We conducted a randomised community trial to investigate the effect of providing surgery in villages on surgical uptake in The Gambia.<bold>Methods: </bold>56 villages from two divisions were assigned to eight pairs of clusters matched by geographical division and proximity. One cluster from each pair was randomly assigned to receive village-based surgery and the other cluster health centre-based surgery. Outcome measures were uptake rates and surgical results after 1 week and 3 months. The paired t-test was used to analyse the results.<bold>Results: </bold>Overall uptake was 66% in the village-based clusters and 44% in the health centre-based clusters. Subjects in the village-based surgery arm had significantly shorter journey times (P = 0.01) and lower costs (P = 0.002). The mean difference in absolute acceptance rates of surgery was 20% better in village-based clusters (95% CI -9 to + 49%, P = 0.15), which would equate to an improvement of 45% (95% CI -20% to 120%) on the average acceptance rates of 44% in the health centre-based group.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>These results strongly suggest better surgical uptake when surgery is provided in patients' villages due to lower cost to the patient, time saved and less fear of the operation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]