Deliberative decision-making on radioactive waste management in Finland, France and the UK: influence of mixed forms of deliberation in the macro discursive context.

This article analyses the nature and role of recently established deliberative and participatory mechanisms of planning and decision-making on radioactive waste management in three countries that have recently committed to extending their nuclear capacity - Finland, France and the UK. The article introduces the micro and macro theories of deliberative democracy, and - by relying on the distinction between the normative, substantive and instrumental functions of participation - examines the degrees to which the different deliberative mechanisms succeeded in bridging the boundary between the micro and macro deliberation. The empirical analysis illustrates how the functions and the influence of these mechanisms have been conditioned by the broader macro discursive sphere, within which the mixed forms of deliberation take place. Elements of all three functions of participation could be identified to varying degrees in all cases, yet the direct impact of deliberation on policy outcomes was often modest and uncertain. In contrast, the analysis highlights, on the one hand, the indirect impacts of deliberation - notably through the creation of norms of deliberative democracy - and on the other hand, the need to consider the broader macro discursive sphere when designing processes and institutions of deliberation. The case studies suggest that the control over knowledge production as well as the trust in government institutions were pivotal in explaining the influence of deliberation in the three countries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]