Back to Search Start Over

Single-port-access (SPATM) cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional report of the first 297 cases.

Authors :
Curcillo II, Paul G.
Wu, Andrew S.
Podolsky, Erica R.
Graybeal, Casey
Katkhouda, Namir
Saenz, Alex
Dunham, Robert
Fendley, Steven
Neff, Marc
Copper, Chad
Bessler, Marc
Gumbs, Andrew A.
Norton, Michael
Iannelli, Antonio
Mason, Rodney
Moazzez, Ashkan
Cohen, Larry
Mouhlas, Angela
Poor, Alex
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques; Aug2010, Vol. 24 Issue 8, p1854-1860, 7p, 6 Color Photographs, 1 Diagram
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

An important aspect of a new surgical technique is whether it can be performed by other surgeons in other institutions. The authors report the first 297 cases in a multi-institutional and multinational review of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed via a single portal of entry. Data were collected retrospectively for the initial patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy by 13 surgeons who performed these procedures in their institutions after training by the authors. The review included operative time, blood loss, incision length, length of hospital stay (LOS), necessary additional trocars, and other parameters important to cholecystectomy. A database of all the single-port-access (SPA) surgeries performed by the surgeons included demographic and procedural details, LOS, complications, and initial follow-up data. To date, 297 single-port cholecystectomies have been performed for a variety of diagnoses, primarily cholelithiasis. The average operative time was 71 min, and the average LOS was 1–2 days. The average blood loss was minimal. The use of additional port sites outside the umbilicus occurred in 34 of the cases. Of the 35 intraoperative cholangiograms performed, 34 were successful. No significant complications occurred except for seromas and minor postoperative wound infections. These results are comparable with those for standard multiport cholecystectomy. In addition, no access site hernias (ASH) occurred. The findings demonstrate that SPA surgery is an alternative to multiport laparoscopy with fewer scars and better cosmesis. One factor affecting the rate for adoption of SPA surgery among other surgeons is the reproducibility of this new procedure. Although this study had insufficient data to determine fully the benefits of SPA surgery, the feasibility of this procedure with safe, acceptable results was demonstrated in this initial large series across multinational institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18666817
Volume :
24
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
51880189
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0856-x