Back to Search Start Over

Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors :
.Bombard, Yvonne
Miller, Fiona A.
Hayeems, Robin Z.
Avard, Denise
Knoppers, Bartha M.
Source :
European Journal of Human Genetics; Jul2010, Vol. 18 Issue 7, p751-760, 10p, 3 Diagrams, 2 Charts
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

The expansion of newborn screening (NBS) has been accompanied by debate about what benefits should be achieved and the role of parental discretion in their pursuit. The opportunity to inform parents of reproductive risks is among the most valued additional benefits gained through NBS, and assumes prominence where the primary goal of identifying a treatable condition is not assured. We reviewed 53 unique guidelines addressing prenatal, preconception and newborn screening to examine: (1) how generating reproductive risk information is construed as a benefit of screening; and (2) what conditions support the realization of this benefit. Most preconception and prenatal guidelines – where generating reproductive risk information is described as a primary benefit – required that individuals be given a ‘cascade of choices’, ensuring that each step in the decision-making process was well informed, from deciding to pursue information about reproductive risks to deciding how to manage them. With the exception of three guidelines, NBS policy infrequently attended to the potential for reproductive benefits; further, most guidelines that acknowledged such benefits construed voluntarism narrowly, without attention to the choices attendant on receiving reproductive risk information. This review suggests that prenatal and preconception guidance identifies a coherent framework to support the pursuit of reproductive benefits through population screening programmes. Interestingly, attention to reproductive benefits is increasing among NBS guidance, yet reflection on how such benefits ought to be pursued remains limited. Traditional norms for NBS may require reconsideration where the remit of screening exceeds the primary goal of clinical benefits for infants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10184813
Volume :
18
Issue :
7
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Journal of Human Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
51455200
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.13