Back to Search Start Over

1.0 REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS.

Authors :
Werner, Ray O.
Griffiths, L. C.
Source :
Journal of Marketing; Apr1977, Vol. 41 Issue 2, p98-101, 4p
Publication Year :
1977

Abstract

The article presents U.S. legal cases and developments in marketing relative to the regulation of monopolistic methods. In reference to market control the Purex Corp., Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Co., and the Clorox Co., the United States v. International Harvester Co., and Steiger Tractor Inc., and the Beatrice Foods Co. v. Federal Trade Commission cases are cited. In reference to collusive practices the Feminist Women's Health Center, Inc. v. Mahmood Mohammad, M.D., et al. and the United States v. Dan B. Buzzard cases are cited among others. In reference to market exclusion tactics the Harris v. Bolin and the Dunn v. Frank Miller cases are cited among others.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00222429
Volume :
41
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Marketing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
4996820