Back to Search Start Over

Pharmacokinetics of Gemcitabine and Metabolites in a Patient with Double-Sided Nephrectomy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors :
KOOLEN, STIJN L.W.
HUITEMA, ALWIN D. R.
JANSEN, ROBERT S.
VAN VOORTHUIZEN, THEO
BEIJNEN, JOS H.
SMIT, WILLEM M.
SCHELLENS, JAN H. M.
Source :
Oncologist; Sep2009, Vol. 14 Issue 9, p944-948, 5p, 1 Chart, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Case. A patient with complete renal failure as a result of urothelial cell carcinoma-related nephrectomy of both kidneys received palliative chemotherapy with carboplatin and gemcitabine. Treatment. The patient received gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m<superscript>2</superscript> followed by carboplatin at 100 mg. Shortly after, he underwent hemodialysis. The pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine and metabolites in plasma and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were monitored. Results. Double-sided nephrectomy and hemodialysis had no influence on gemcitabine pharmacokinetics; however, a high exposure was seen for the main metabolite, difluordeoxyuridine (dFdU) (area under the concentration-time curve, 0-51 hours, 844 μg/ml7hour). During hemodialysis, plasma concentrations of dFdU were reduced by 50%. High concentrations of intracellular phosphorylated metabolites (gemcitabine triphosphate and dFdU triphosphate) were observed: 228 pmol/10<superscript>6</superscript> cells and 47 pmol/10<superscript>6</superscript> cells, respectively. The patient tolerated the regimen poorly; adverse events included grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Conclusion. Hemodialysis effectively reduced plasma concentrations of dFdU. Furthermore, high concentrations of intracellular phosphorylated metabolites may be related to double-sided nephrectomy, resulting in poor tolerability of gemcitabine. The Oncologist 2009;14:944-948 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10837159
Volume :
14
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Oncologist
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
48329302
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0111