Biophysical Evaluation of Land-Cover Products for Land–Climate Modeling.

The need for accurate characterization of the land surface as boundary conditions in climate models has been recognized widely in the climate modeling community. A large number of land-cover datasets are currently used in climate models either to better represent surface conditions or to study the impacts of surface changes. Deciding upon land-cover datasets can be challenging because the datasets are made with different sensors, ranging methodologies, and varying classification objectives. A new statistical measure Q was developed to evaluate land-cover datasets in land–climate interaction research. This measure calculates biophysical precision of land-cover datasets using 1-km monthly Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) leaf area index (LAI) product. This method aggregates within-class biophysical consistency, calculated as LAI variation, across a study domain and over multiple years into a single statistic. A smaller mean Q value for a land-cover product indicates more precise biophysical characterization within the classes. As an illustration, four land-cover products were assessed in the East Africa region: Global Land Cover 2000 (GLC2000), MODIS land cover, Olson Global Ecosystems (OGE), and Land Ecosystem–Atmosphere Feedback (LEAF) model. The evaluation was conducted at three different spatial scales corresponding to 30 × 30, 50 × 50, and 100 × 100 km quadrates. The Q measure found that GLC2000 ranked higher compared to the other three land-cover products for every quadrate size. For the 30 × 30 km quadrate size GLC2000 was significantly better than LEAF, which is currently used in the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System. The statistic ranks MODIS land cover above OGE, which is above LEAF. As quadrate size increases, differences between Q decrease indicating greater uncertainty at coarser resolution. The utility of the measure is that it can be applied to any continuous parameter over any scale (space or time) to evaluate the biophysical precision of any land-cover dataset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]