Back to Search Start Over

On the Robustness of Model-Based Sampling in Auditing.

Authors :
Chen-en Ko
Nachtsheim, Christopher J.
Duke, Gordon L.
Bailey Jr, Andrew D.
Source :
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory; Spring88, Vol. 7 Issue 2, p119, 18p
Publication Year :
1988

Abstract

In contrast with classical, randomization-based strategies, model-based sampling is purposive, i.e., not random in nature. Unfortunately, the optimality of model-robust procedures depends heavily on the assumption that the true form of the superpopulation model is known to the sampler prior to sampling. To date, model-based sampling has not found wide application due to concerns about the robustness of the approach in the presence of superpopulation model misspecification. This paper evaluates the robustness of model-based sampling strategies in audit settngs. In doing so we introduce the concept of model-robust sampling, an extension of model-based sampling which provides some protection against model misspecification. An efficient algorithm for sample selection is presented. Simulation is used to measure the robustness of the various model-based approaches to changes in assumptions about the target population. We conclude that while substantive gains in efficiency are possible through model-based sampling, randomization-based strategies should be preferred in the absence of reliable prior information as to the assumed form of the variance function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02780380
Volume :
7
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
4681877