Back to Search Start Over

Guidelines for patient selection and performance of carotid artery stenting.

Authors :
Bladin, C.
Chambers, B.
Crimmins, D.
Davis, S.
Donnan, G.
Frayne, J.
Levi, C.
Muller, D.
New, G.
Denton, M.
Lawrence-Brown, M.
Phatouros, C.
Scroop, R.
Harrington, T.
Source :
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology; Dec2009, Vol. 53 Issue 6, p538-545, 8p, 3 Charts
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

The endovascular treatment of carotid atherosclerosis with carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains controversial. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the benchmark in terms of procedural mortality and morbidity. Consensus Australasian guidelines for the safe performance of CAS were developed using the modified Delphi consensus method of iterative consultation. Selection of patients suitable for CAS needs careful consideration of clinical and patho-anatomical criteria. Randomised controlled trials and pooled analyses have demonstrated that CAS is more hazardous than CEA. The CGSC therefore recommends that CAS should not be performed in the majority of patients requiring carotid revascularisation. There is currently no evidence to support CAS as a treatment for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The use of distal protection devices during CAS remains controversial with increased risk of clinically silent stroke. The knowledge requirements for the safe performance of CAS include an understanding of the evidence base from randomised controlled trials, carotid and aortic arch anatomy and pathology, and recognition and management of periprocedural complications. It is critical that all patients being considered for a carotid intervention have adequate pre-procedural neuroimaging and peri-procedural, independent, neurological assessment. Maintenance of proficiency in CAS requires active involvement in surgical/endovascular audit and continuing medical education programmes. These standards should apply in the public and private health-care settings. These guidelines represent the consensus of an intercollegiate committee in order to direct appropriate patient selection to perform CAS. Advances in endovascular technologies and the results of randomised controlled trials will guide future revisions of this document. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17549477
Volume :
53
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
45469122
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02120.x