Back to Search Start Over

Usefulness of 201TL SPECT/CT relative to 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrent skull base nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors :
Yen, Ruoh-Fang
Ting, Lai-Lei
Cheng, Mei-Fang
Wu, Yen-Wen
Tzen, Kai-Yuan
Hong, Ruey-Long
Source :
Head & Neck; Jun2009, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p717-724, 8p, 3 Black and White Photographs, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Background This study was designed to compare <superscript>201</superscript>Tl single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT with 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (<superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG) PET/CT in diagnosing recurrent skull base nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods Twenty-seven patients were recruited. Both <superscript>201</superscript>Tl SPECT/CT and <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT for each patient were performed at least 4 months later after initial therapy. Results The sensitivity and specificity for <superscript>201</superscript>Tl SPECT/CT were 66.7% and 100%, and those for <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT were 86.7% and 75.0%. Lesion/background ratios were obtained for the 10 lesions that were both SPECT and PET true positive. For the 8 patients with recurrences in nasopharyngeal regions, PET lesion/background ratios were all higher than SPECT lesion/background ratios. For the 2 patients with intracranial metastases, SPECT lesion/background ratios were higher than PET lesion/background ratios. Conclusion <superscript>201</superscript>Tl SPECT/CT is as effective as <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT in detecting recurrent NPC. For intracranial recurrence, <superscript>201</superscript>Tl SPECT, because of its high intracranial lesion/background ratio, is probably better than <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10433074
Volume :
31
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Head & Neck
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
39557231
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21026