Poor agreement between Goldmann and Pascal tonometry in eyes with extreme pachymetry.

AimTo compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained using the Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (PDCT) with the standard Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and to correlate them with the central corneal thickness (CCT) in a non-glaucomatous population.MethodsWe prospectively measured IOP using PDCT and GAT in random order in 100 normal eyes. CCT was analysed with an ultrasonic pachymeter in each case. Statistical analysis of baseline and stratified data included intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Lin correlation, and Bland–Altman analysis to evaluate the agreement between both techniques.ResultsGAT was used first in 51 eyes and PDCT in 48 cases. Mean IOP was 14.8 mm Hg with GAT and 20.3 mm Hg with PDCT. Mean pachymetry was 553.23 micrometres (μm) (SD: 4.7 μm). Global agreement of IOP between GAT and PDCT was 0.09 by ICC and 0.170 by Lin correlation. When CCT values ranged between 540 and 545 μm, the agreement between both tonometers was optimal (ICC 0.54 and Lin 0.61). Outside these pachymetry values, agreement between both tonometers diminished dramatically.ConclusionStatistically significant agreement between both devices was reached only at intermediate pachymetry readings in contrast with other studies that show excellent global agreement between GAT and PDCT.Eye (2009) 23, 536–542; doi:10.1038/eye.2008.90; published online 28 March 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]