Back to Search Start Over

Worst-Case to Average-Case Reductions Revisited.

Authors :
Hutchison, David
Kanade, Takeo
Kittler, Josef
Kleinberg, Jon M.
Mattern, Friedemann
Mitchell, John C.
Naor, Moni
Nierstrasz, Oscar
Pandu Rangan, C.
Steffen, Bernhard
Sudan, Madhu
Terzopoulos, Demetri
Tygar, Doug
Vardi, Moshe Y.
Weikum, Gerhard
Charikar, Moses
Jansen, Klaus
Reingold, Omer
Rolim, José D. P.
Gutfreund, Dan
Source :
Approximation, Randomization & Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms & Techniques (9783540742074); 2007, p569-583, 15p
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

A fundamental goal of computational complexity (and foundations of cryptography) is to find a polynomial-time samplable distribution (e.g., the uniform distribution) and a language in NTIME(f(n)) for some polynomial function f, such that the language is hard on the average with respect to this distribution, given that NP is worst-case hard (i.e. NP ≠ P, or ${\rm NP} \not \subseteq {\rm BPP}$). Currently, no such result is known even if we relax the language to be in nondeterministic sub-exponential time. There has been a long line of research trying to explain our failure in proving such worst-case/average-case connections [FF93,Vio03,BT03,AGGM06]. The bottom line of this research is essentially that (under plausible assumptions) non-adaptive Turing reductions cannot prove such results. In this paper we revisit the problem. Our first observation is that the above mentioned negative arguments extend to a non-standard notion of average-case complexity, in which the distribution on the inputs with respect to which we measure the average-case complexity of the language, is only samplable in super-polynomial time. The significance of this result stems from the fact that in this non-standard setting,[GSTS05] did show a worst-case/average-case connection. In other words, their techniques give a way to bypass the impossibility arguments. By taking a closer look at the proof of [GSTS05], we discover that the worst-case/average-case connection is proven by a reduction that "almost" falls under the category ruled out by the negative result. This gives rise to an intriguing new notion of (almost black-box) reductions. After extending the negative results to the non-standard average-case setting of [GSTS05], we ask whether their positive result can be extended to the standard setting, to prove some new worst-case/average-case connections. While we can not do that unconditionally, we are able to show that under a mild derandomization assumption, the worst-case hardness of NP implies the average-case hardness of NTIME(f(n)) (under the uniform distribution) where f is computable in quasi-polynomial time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISBNs :
9783540742074
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Approximation, Randomization & Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms & Techniques (9783540742074)
Publication Type :
Book
Accession number :
33421238
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74208-1_41