Back to Search Start Over

Regularization Versus Dimension Reduction, Which Is Better?

Authors :
Hutchison, David
Kanade, Takeo
Kittler, Josef
Kleinberg, Jon M.
Mattern, Friedemann
Mitchell, John C.
Naor, Moni
Nierstrasz, Oscar
Rangan, C. Pandu
Steffen, Bernhard
Sudan, Madhu
Terzopoulos, Demetri
Tygar, Doug
Vardi, Moshe Y.
Weikum, Gerhard
Liu, Derong
Fei, Shumin
Hou, Zengguang
Zhang, Huaguang
Sun, Changyin
Source :
Advances in Neural Networks: ISNN 2007; 2007, p474-482, 9p
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

There exist two main solutions for the classification of high-dimensional data with small number settings. One is to classify them directly in high-dimensional space with regularization methods, and the other is to reduce data dimension first, then classify them in feature space. However, which is better on earth? In this paper, the comparative studies for regularization and dimension reduction approaches are given with two typical sets of high-dimensional data from real world: Raman spectroscopy signals and stellar spectra data. Experimental results show that in most cases, the dimension reduction methods can obtain acceptable classification results, and cost less computation time. When the training sample number is insufficient and distribution is unbalance seriously, performance of some regularization approaches is better than those dimension reduction ones, but regularization methods cost more computation time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISBNs :
9783540723929
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Advances in Neural Networks: ISNN 2007
Publication Type :
Book
Accession number :
33198819
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72393-6_57