Back to Search Start Over

Effects of grown-in defects on interdiffusion dynamics in InAs/InP(001) quantum dots subjected to rapid thermal annealing.

Authors :
Dion, C.
Desjardins, P.
Shtinkov, N.
Schiettekatte, F.
Poole, P. J.
Raymond, S.
Source :
Journal of Applied Physics; Apr2008, Vol. 103 Issue 8, p083526-10, 10p, 10 Graphs
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

This work investigates the interdiffusion dynamics in self-assembled InAs/InP(001) quantum dots (QDs) subjected to rapid thermal annealing in the 600–775 °C temperature range. We compare two QD samples capped with InP grown at either optimal or reduced temperature to induce grown-in defects. Atomic interdiffusion is assessed by using photoluminescence measurements in conjunction with tight-binding calculations. By assuming Fickian diffusion, the interdiffusion lengths L<subscript>I</subscript> are determined as a function of annealing conditions from the comparison of the measured optical transition energies with those calculated for InP/InAs<subscript>1-x</subscript>P<subscript>x</subscript>/InP quantum wells with graded interfaces. L<subscript>I</subscript> values are then analyzed using a one-dimensional interdiffusion model that accounts for both the transport of nonequilibrium concentrations of P interstitials from the InP capping layer to the InAs active region and the P–As substitution in the QD vicinity. It is demonstrated that each process is characterized by a diffusion coefficient D<superscript>(i)</superscript> given by D<superscript>(i)</superscript>=D<subscript>0</subscript><superscript>(i)</superscript> exp(-E<subscript>a</subscript><superscript>(i)</superscript>/k<subscript>B</subscript>T<subscript>a</subscript>). The activation energy and pre-exponential factor for P interstitial diffusion in the InP matrix are E<subscript>a</subscript><superscript>(P–InP)</superscript>=2.7±0.3 eV and D<subscript>0</subscript><superscript>(P–InP)</superscript>=10<superscript>3.6±0.9</superscript> cm<superscript>2</superscript> s<superscript>-1</superscript>, which are independent of the InP growth conditions. For the P–As substitution process, E<subscript>a</subscript><superscript>(P–As)</superscript>=2.3±0.2 eV and (c<subscript>o</subscript>/n<subscript>o</subscript>)D<subscript>0</subscript><superscript>(P–As)</superscript>∼10<superscript>-5</superscript>-10<superscript>-4</superscript> cm<superscript>2</superscript> s<superscript>-1</superscript>, which depend on the QD height and concentration of grown-in defects (c<subscript>o</subscript>/n<subscript>o</subscript>). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00218979
Volume :
103
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Applied Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31873492
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2905317