ANALYSIS OF STRATEGIC CONTEXTUALIZATION OF KNOW-HOW KNOWLEDGE: CRITICAL THINKING AND THINKING CRITICALLY.

Academic critical thinking and thinking critically are known as the two syllogistic expository component parts of intellectual organized manners of the know-how knowledge. Both are concerned the intrinsic traditional and extrinsic innovative cognitive deliberations on truth findings. The research undertaken has revealed significant differences in strategic contextualization approaches by application of the two sets of models. Specifically, with regard to their academic efficacy and efficiency, both sets of models were generally how to enhance human knowledge concerning factfindings and assertions of truth. Analysis of perceptual similarities and differences, however, revealed that more variable perceptions exist between critical thinking and thinking critically. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]