Back to Search Start Over

The conversion of chicken manure to bio-oil by fast pyrolysis. III. Analyses of chicken manure, bio-oils and char by Py-FIMS and Py-FDMS.

Authors :
Schnitzer, MorrisI.
Monreal, CarlosM.
Jandl, Gerald
Source :
Journal of Environmental Science & Health. Part B. Pesticides, Food Contaminants & Agricultural Wastes; Jan2008, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p81-95, 15p, 3 Charts, 4 Graphs
Publication Year :
2008

Abstract

Fast pyrolysis of chicken manure produced the following three fractions: bio-oil Fraction I, bio-oil Fraction II, and a char. In a previous investigation we analyzed each of the four materials by curie-point pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (CpPy-FDMS). The objective of this article is to report on the analyses of the same chicken manure and the three fractions derived from it by fast pyrolysis. We now used pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry (Py-FIMS) to characterize the three fractions. In addition, the two bio-oil materials were analyzed by pyrolysis-field desorption mass spectrometry (Py-FDMS). The use of both Py-FIMS and Py-FDMS produced signals over significantly wider mass ranges than did CpPy-GC/MS, and so allowed us to identify considerably larger numbers of constituents in each material. Individual compounds identified in the mass spectra were classified into the following twelve compound classes: (a) low molecular weight compounds (< m/z 62); (b) carbohydrates; (c) phenols + lignin monomers; (d) lignin dimers; (e) n-alkylbenzenes; (f) N-heterocyclics; (g) n-fatty acids; (h) n-alkanes; (i) alkenes; (j) sterols; (k) n-diols and (l) high molecular weight compounds (> m/z 562). Of special interest were the high abundances of low-molecular weight compounds in the two bio-oils which constituted close to one half of the two bio-oils. Prominent among these compounds were water, ammonia, acetic acid, acetamide, propyl radical, formamide and hydrogen cyanide. The main quantitative differences between the two bio-oils was that bio-oil Fraction I, as analyzed by the two mass spectrometric methods, contained lower concentrations of low-molecular weight compounds, carbohydrates, and N-heterocyclics than bio-oil Fraction II but was richer in lignin dimers, n-alkylbenzenes and aliphatics (n-fatty acids, n-alkanes, alkenes, and n-diols). Of special interest were the N-heterocyclics in the two bio-oils such as pyrazole, pyrazoline, substituted pyrroles, pyridine and substituted pyridines, substituted methoxazole, substituted pyrazines, indole and substituted indoles. Fatty acids in all four materials ranged from n-C9 to n-C33, alkanes from n-C9 to n-C40, alkenes from C10:1 to C40:1 and diols from n-C7 to n-C29. The chicken manure, bio-oil Fraction I, and char each contained about 4% sterols with cholesterol, ethylcholestriene, ergosterol, ethylcholestene, ethylcholesterol and β -sitosterol as major components. Semi-quantitative estimates of the total materials identified by Py-FIMS were: chicken manure: 61.1%; bio-oil Fraction I: 81.3%; bio-oil Fraction II: 78.6%; char: 61.3%; and by Py-FDMS were: bio-oil Fraction I: 65.4%; bio-oil Fraction II: 70.0%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03601234
Volume :
43
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Environmental Science & Health. Part B. Pesticides, Food Contaminants & Agricultural Wastes
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28016013
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230701735185