Back to Search
Start Over
A messy business: qualitative research and ethical review.
- Source :
- Clinical Ethics; 2006, Vol. 1 Issue 2, p114-116, 3p
- Publication Year :
- 2006
-
Abstract
- This paper argues that qualitative research is both useful and necessary, as it provides an essential means of gaining a richer understanding of patients' perceptions, social processes and meanings. In their paper in this edition of Clinical Ethics, Hallowell and Lawton raise many issues relating to the way that qualitative research is treated by RECs in the UK. In this paper I discuss just three key topics stimulated by their paper: the way that methodology relates to ethics, the experience and character of the researcher, and the normative/descriptive distinction. I strongly support Hallowell and Lawton's appeal for greater communication between qualitative researchers and RECs. In other respects, I would argue that they do not go far enough. The recent review of research ethics structures and the review process provides an opportunity to move away from the present 'one size fits all' approach to ethical review. I would argue that this change could only benefit qualitative research and researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- QUALITATIVE research
RESEARCH ethics
SOCIAL processes
ETHICS
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 14777509
- Volume :
- 1
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Clinical Ethics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 25811665
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1258/147775006777254551