Back to Search Start Over

A randomized trial of a physical conditioning program to enhance the driving performance of older persons.

Authors :
Marottoli, Richard A.
Allore, Heather
Araujo, Katy L. B.
Lannone, Lynne P.
Acampora, Denise
Gottschalk, Margaret
Charpentier, Peter
Kasi, Stanislav
Peduzzi, Peter
Iannone, Lynne P
Kasl, Stanislav
Source :
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine; May2007, Vol. 22 Issue 5, p590-597, 8p, 5 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2007

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>As the number of older drivers increases, concern has been raised about the potential safety implications. Flexibility, coordination, and speed of movement have been associated with older drivers' on road performance.<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine whether a multicomponent physical conditioning program targeted to axial and extremity flexibility, coordination, and speed of movement could improve driving performance among older drivers.<bold>Design: </bold>Randomized controlled trial with blinded assignment and end point assessment. Participants randomized to intervention underwent graduated exercises; controls received home, environment safety modules.<bold>Participants: </bold>Drivers, 178, age > or = 70 years with physical, but without substantial visual (acuity 20/40 or better) or cognitive (Mini Mental State Examination score > or =24) impairments were recruited from clinics and community sources.<bold>Measurements: </bold>On-road driving performance assessed by experienced evaluators in dual-brake equipped vehicle in urban, residential, and highway traffic. Performance rated three ways: (1) 36-item scale evaluating driving maneuvers and traffic situations; (2) evaluator's overall rating; and (3) critical errors committed. Driving performance reassessed at 3 months by evaluator blinded to treatment group.<bold>Results: </bold>Least squares mean change in road test scores at 3 months compared to baseline was 2.43 points higher in intervention than control participants (P = .03). Intervention drivers committed 37% fewer critical errors (P = .08); there were no significant differences in evaluator's overall ratings (P = .29). No injuries were reported, and complaints of pain were rare.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>This safe, well-tolerated intervention maintained driving performance, while controls declined during the study period. Having interventions that can maintain or enhance driving performance may allow clinician-patient discussions about driving to adopt a more positive tone, rather than focusing on driving limitation or cessation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08848734
Volume :
22
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
25056422
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0134-3