Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of Consolidation High-Dose Chemotherapy with Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide (HD-ICE) Followed by Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Rescue in Chemosensitive Patients with Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors :
Schlemmer, Marcus
Wendtner, Clemens-Martin
Falk, Martin
Abdel-Rahman, Sultan
Licht, Thomas
Baumert, Jens
Straka, Christian
Hentrich, Marcus
Salat, Christoph
Hiddemann, Wolfgang
Issels, Rolf-Dieter
Source :
Oncology; 2006, Vol. 71 Issue 1/2, p32-39, 8p, 4 Charts, 4 Graphs
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Background: Prognosis of patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (MSTS) is poor even after response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. We report phase II data of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) rescue in patients with MSTS responding to AI-G chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: From 1997 to 2002, 55 patients with MSTS were prospectively treated with 4 cycles of AI-G (doxorubicin 75 mg/m<superscript>2</superscript>, ifosfamide 6 g/m<superscript>2</superscript> with G-CSF support). Responders received 2 further cycles of AI-G with collection of PBSCs. High-dose chemotherapy consisted of ifosfamide 12 g/m<superscript>2</superscript>, carboplatin 1.2 g/m<superscript>2</superscript> and etoposide 1.2 g/m<superscript>2</superscript> (HD-ICE) followed by reinfusion of PBSCs. Results: Twenty-one of 55 patients (38%) were assessed as responders (3 complete response, 18 partial response). All but 2 patients refusing treatment received high-dose chemotherapy with PBSC rescue leading to grade IV hematologic toxicity without severe infections in all patients. No toxic death occurred. After a median follow-up time of 30 months, the median progression-free time was 12 months and survival time was 22 months for the entire group. By intent-to-treat analysis the probability of 5-year progression-free survival was significantly higher for patients allocated to HD-ICE compared to patients receiving second-line chemotherapy after failure of AI-G (14 vs. 3%; p = 0.003). The estimated 5-year overall survival between the 2 groups was different (27% vs. not reached) but did not reach significance (p = 0.08). Conclusion: HD-ICE is feasible and promising in patients with chemosensitive MSTS. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to further define the role of HD-ICE as consolidation treatment in these patients. Copyright © 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00302414
Volume :
71
Issue :
1/2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
24635452
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1159/000100447