Cite

Comparative evaluation of the sensitivity of LAMP, PCR and in vitro culture methods for the diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis.

MLA

Andy Alhassan, et al. “Comparative Evaluation of the Sensitivity of LAMP, PCR and in Vitro Culture Methods for the Diagnosis of Equine Piroplasmosis.” Parasitology Research, vol. 100, no. 5, Apr. 2007, pp. 1165–68. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0430-6.



APA

Andy Alhassan, Yadav Govind, Nguyen Tam, Oriel Thekisoe, Naoaki Yokoyama, Noboru Inoue, & Ikuo Igarashi. (2007). Comparative evaluation of the sensitivity of LAMP, PCR and in vitro culture methods for the diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis. Parasitology Research, 100(5), 1165–1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0430-6



Chicago

Andy Alhassan, Yadav Govind, Nguyen Tam, Oriel Thekisoe, Naoaki Yokoyama, Noboru Inoue, and Ikuo Igarashi. 2007. “Comparative Evaluation of the Sensitivity of LAMP, PCR and in Vitro Culture Methods for the Diagnosis of Equine Piroplasmosis.” Parasitology Research 100 (5): 1165–68. doi:10.1007/s00436-006-0430-6.