Back to Search
Start Over
Why Does the Federal Government Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter of Rights Cases? A Strategic Explanation.
- Source :
- Law & Society Review; Mar2007, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p225-250, 26p, 2 Charts
- Publication Year :
- 2007
-
Abstract
- Despite the impressive body of scholarship dedicated to analyzing litigation involving the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the Supreme Court of Canada, there remains an incomplete understanding of why these cases come to the Court. Notably absent from the literature is sustained analysis of why governments, the most frequent class of appellant, bring Charter cases to the Supreme Court. Recent work has addressed the decision to appeal by the U.S. federal government and state attorneys general and provides an excellent theoretical starting point. I use case data collected from interviews with federal government lawyers and law reports to test whether the Canadian federal government's decisions to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada in Charter cases are also “procedurally rational.” I conclude that these decisions are primarily shaped by strategic considerations related to policy costs, case importance, reviewability, and the prospect of winning on appeal, regardless of the party in power. In the process, the article further extends the application of strategic decisionmaking theory with regard to law and courts beyond judicial behavior, and beyond the U.S. context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00239216
- Volume :
- 41
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Law & Society Review
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 24150240
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00296.x