Back to Search Start Over

A novel self-microemulsifying formulation of paclitaxel for oral administration to patients with advanced cancer.

Authors :
Veltkamp, S. A.
Thijssen, B.
Garrigue, J. S.
Lambert, G.
Lallemand, F.
Binlich, F.
Huitema, A. D. R.
Nuijen, B.
Nol, A.
Beijnen, J. H.
Schellens, J. H. M.
Source :
British Journal of Cancer; 9/18/2006, Vol. 95 Issue 6, p729-734, 6p, 4 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

To explore the parmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of paclitaxel after oral administration of SMEOF#3, a novel Self-Microemulsifying Oily Formulation, in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with advanced cancer. Seven patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive oral paclitaxel (SMEOF#3) 160 mg+CsA 700 mg on day 1, followed by oral paclitaxel (Taxol<superscript>®</superscript>) 160 mg+CsA 700 mg on day 8 (group I) or vice versa (group II). Patients received paclitaxel (Taxol<superscript>®</superscript>) 160 mg as 3-h infusion on day 15. The median (range) area under the plasma concentration–time curve of paclitaxel was 2.06 (1.15–3.47) μg h ml<superscript>−1</superscript> and 1.97 (0.58–3.22) μg h ml<superscript>−1</superscript> after oral administration of SMEOF#3 and Taxol<superscript>®</superscript>, respectively, and 4.69 (3.90–6.09) μg h ml<superscript>−1</superscript> after intravenous Taxol<superscript>®</superscript>. Oral SMEOF#3 resulted in a lower median T<subscript>max</subscript> of 2.0 (0.5–2.0) h than orally applied Taxol<superscript>®</superscript> (T<subscript>max</subscript>=4.0 (0.8–6.1) h, P=0.02). The median apparent bioavailability of paclitaxel was 40 (19–83)% and 55 (9–70)% for the oral SMEOF#3 and oral Taxol<superscript>®</superscript> formulation, respectively. Oral paclitaxel administered as SMEOF#3 or Taxol<superscript>®</superscript> was safe and well tolerated by the patients. Remarkably, the SMEOF#3 formulation resulted in a significantly lower T<subscript>max</subscript> than orally applied Taxol<superscript>®</superscript>, probably due to the excipients in the SMEOF#3 formulation resulting in a higher absorption rate of paclitaxel.British Journal of Cancer (2006) 95, 729–734. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603312 www.bjcancer.com Published online 22 August 2006 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00070920
Volume :
95
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
British Journal of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22307705
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603312