Back to Search Start Over

New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: Comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance

Authors :
Nikitin, Nikolay P.
Constantin, Cristina
Loh, Poay Huan
Ghosh, Justin
Lukaschuk, Elena I.
Bennett, Anna
Hurren, Sarah
Alamgir, Farqad
Clark, Andrew L.
Cleland, John G.F.
Source :
European Journal of Echocardiography; Oct2006, Vol. 7 Issue 5, p365-372, 8p
Publication Year :
2006

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) structure and function is important in the evaluation of cardiac patients. This study was designed to test the accuracy and reproducibility of new generation 3-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) in measuring volumetric and functional LV indices as compared with current “gold standard” of non-invasive cardiac imaging, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Methods and results: Sixty-four subjects with good acoustic windows, including 40 cardiac patients with LV ejection fraction (EF)<45%, 14 patients with EF>45% and 10 normal volunteers underwent 3DE using a commercially available Philips Sonos 7500 scanner equipped with a matrix phase-array x4 xMATRIX transducer, and CMR on a 1.5T Signa CV/i scanner (GE Medical Systems). Volumetric assessment was performed with analytical 4D-LV-Analysis software (TomTec) for 3DE and MRI-Mass software (Medis) for CMR. We found no significant differences in LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV) and EF with excellent correlations between the indices measured using 3DE and CMR (r =0.97, r =0.98, and r =0.94, respectively). Bland–Altman analysis showed bias of 7ml for EDV, 3ml for ESV and −1% for EF with 3DE with corresponding limits of agreement (2SD) of 28ml, 22ml and 10%, respectively. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were for EDV: 3% and 4% (3DE) vs 2% and 2% (CMR), for ESV: 3% and 6% (3DE) vs 2% and 3% (CMR), and for EF: 4% and 4% (3DE) vs 2% and 4% (CMR), respectively. Conclusion: New generation 3DE provides accurate and reproducible quantification of LV volumetric and functional data in subjects with good acoustic windows as compared with CMR. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15252167
Volume :
7
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Journal of Echocardiography
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
22228845
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euje.2005.09.005